<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!--  If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. http://www.livejournal.com/bots/  -->
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/' xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' xmlns:atom10='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<channel>
  <title>A Bayesian viewpoint</title>
  <link>http://bayesrules.livejournal.com/</link>
  <description>A Bayesian viewpoint - LiveJournal.com</description>
  <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:05:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / LiveJournal.com</generator>
  <lj:journal>bayesrules</lj:journal>
  <lj:journalid>14224142</lj:journalid>
  <lj:journaltype>personal</lj:journaltype>
  <atom10:link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/' />
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://bayesrules.livejournal.com/536.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 23:05:21 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Who has looked at how &quot;approximate&quot; Fuzzy is?</title>
  <link>http://bayesrules.livejournal.com/536.html</link>
  <description>...well to start right in on a probability theme, the question came up in discussion in the lobby at SFI&apos;s annual meeting about &lt;b&gt;Fuzzy logic.&lt;/b&gt;; Specifically its use in modeling.  The ML community has largely discounted its use, and the current texts just mention it in passing.    &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The point is to find a balanced comparison of Fuzzy and probabilistic methods. I know what you&apos;re thinking already -- so stop before you say it! I&apos;m not advocating anything.  Its just merits a careful comparison of what is lost by Fuzzy approximations and what the gain is, in simplicity. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I&apos;ll have to go back to ``pre-wikipedia&apos;&apos; sources (e.g. books) to work this one out.</description>
  <comments>http://bayesrules.livejournal.com/536.html</comments>
  <category>reasoning</category>
  <category>probability</category>
  <lj:mood>hopeful</lj:mood>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
  <lj:reply-count>0</lj:reply-count>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
